Fed’s Bullard: ‘no reason’ economy can’t bounce back sharply

‘I know it’s become popular to say that is not going to happen. I think it can happen,’ says St Louis Fed chief.

Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis President James Bullard repeatedly stressed on Tuesday that mass testing of Americans is necessary to ensure confidence for workers to return to jobs and for businesses to invest [File: Bloomberg]
Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis President James Bullard repeatedly stressed on Tuesday that mass testing of Americans is necessary to ensure confidence for workers to return to jobs and for businesses to invest [File: Bloomberg]

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said the U.S. economy should recover strongly in the second half of 2020 if the government and businesses respond forcefully to the coronavirus, with massive testing to prevent fresh outbreaks.

“There is no reason it can’t come back in a ‘V’ shape,” Bullard said in a virtual discussion Tuesday to the St. Louis Regional Chamber. “I know it’s become popular to say that is not going to happen. I think it can happen.”

The central bank has responded aggressively to blunt the effect of the pandemic on the U.S. economy, launching an unprecedented range of emergency programs to support as much as $2.3 trillion in loans and slashing interest rates to almost zero.

Most economists expect a recovery that will be moderate and drawn out, with unemployment initially surging before declining to around 8.1% in the final three months of 2020, according to a Bloomberg News survey this month. Even in 2022, unemployment is expected to average 5.4%.

Test, test, test

Bullard repeatedly stressed mass testing of Americans as necessary to ensure confidence for workers to return and businesses to invest. He praised the actions by Congress and the Trump administration to provide relief during the downturn.

A robust recovery “can happen if this is managed appropriately, if you make sure everyone is comfortable and able to pay their bills through the second quarter, if you can get the virus under control,” Bullard said. “As incidents of the disease go way down, then I think you should be able to reopen. Ideally you would like to test everybody. If you can’t test everybody, you are going to have to use relatively crude substitutes like taking everybody’s temperature.”

The partial shutdown in the U.S. economy could halve gross domestic product this quarter and push unemployment to around 30%, Bullard estimated last month. Today, he said there are a range of outcomes possible for the jobless rate.

“Most people think today the unemployment rate is already in the double-digit range,” Bullard said, referring to unemployment insurance as “pandemic relief.” “Ideally, the unemployment rate would spike at a high level then come down again as we get the economy started up again on the other side of this crisis.”

Bullard, who has been among the most dovish Fed officials the last three years, has urged a comprehensive government response to the pandemic, arguing that businesses and workers should be fully backed during the shutdowns as part of what amounts to an investment in public health.

Costly Quarantine

Bullard called the shelter-at-home quarantine that has shuttered important parts of the economy an inefficient but appropriate response as the pandemic spread through the country. He estimated it is costing the U.S. $25 billion every day in lost household income.

Fed officials have been unified in backing broad assistance. “We’ll use our authority forcefully and aggressively until we’re confident the economy’s recovered,” said Vice Chairman Richard Clarida on Monday.

As part of its emergency programs, the Fed will loan to state and local governments and fund the purchases of some types of high-yield bonds issued by companies that were rated investment grade before the start of the crisis but have since been downgraded.

Chicago Fed chief Charles Evans said that it was entirely appropriate to “socialize” the costs of responding to the pandemic because it was affecting the entire nation.

“There’s just no way you could have insured against this. That is a role for government, to sort of socialize more of these losses,” he said during a virtual discussion hosted by the Carnegie Mellon University Tepper School of Business. “That’s going to determine what the society and capitalism looks like going forward.”

(Updates with Evans in financial paragraph.)

–With assistance from Matthew Boesler.

Source : Bloomberg

More from Economy
Most Read