N Korea ‘test-fires more missiles’

Reports of short-range missile tests come day after nuclear test sparked UN condemnation.

North Korea's series of tests have escalated tensions on the Korean peninsula [GALLO/GETTY]
North Korea's series of tests have escalated tensions on the Korean peninsula [GALLO/GETTY]

“The members of the Security Council have decided to start work immediately on a Security Council resolution on this matter,” the body said in a statement after holding crisis talks on Monday.

In depth

North Korea: A state of war
 Timeline: N Korea’s bomb
 North Korea conducts nuclear test
 Obama condemns ‘reckless’ N Korea
 North Korea nuclear test angers China
 Seoul joins US anti-WMD drive
 Markets rattled by N Korea test
 World reaction: N Korea bomb test

South Korea’s nuclear fears
 China’s troublesome ally
 N Korea test sparks alarm
 UN ‘should expel N Korea’
 N Korea’s ‘nuclear gamble’
 John Bolton on N Korea

At the White House, the US president also condemned the test as “reckless” and pledged to take action in response to the underground blast, which was said to be 20 times more powerful than the 2006 test.

“North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programmes pose a grave threat to the peace and security of the world, and I strongly condemn their reckless action,” Barack Obama told reporters.

Obama called the test “a blunt violation of international law” and said Pyongyang had reneged on its commitment to abandon its nuclear ambitions.

He was later reported to have phoned the leaders of Japan and South Korea to assure them of the US’s “unequivocal commitment” to their defence.

South Korea meanwhile has announced that it will formally join a US-led initiative to intercept ships suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction – a move seen as likely to compound tensions in the region.

North Korea has previously warned that it would view the South’s membership of the of Proliferation Security Initiative as tantamount to “a declaration of war”.

‘Price to pay’

The UN talks were preceded by a “P5 + 2” session between the five permanent members of the security council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Japan and South Korea.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, also joined widespread international criticism of the test, saying he was “deeply disturbed” by reports it had taken place.

“They should have come to the dialogue table and resolved all the issues through peaceful means,” he said.

The nuclear test site is believed to be near the northeastern town of Kilchu

Following the UN talks, several diplomats hinted that they would push for fresh sanctions against North Korea under a new resolution.

“This resolution should include new sanctions in addition to those already adopted because such behaviour should have a cost and a price to pay,” Jean-Pierre Lacroix, the French deputy permanent representative, told reporters.

Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN, said Washington would seek “a strong resolution”, calling the test “a grave violation of international law, and a threat to regional and international peace and security”.

Rice, however, stopped short of mentioning possible sanctions.

John Bolton, a former US ambassador to the UN during the administration of George Bush, told Al Jazeera the US needed to respond to the test using “strong measures”.

“I think we should conclude from this that North Korea is not going to be talked out of its nuclear programme,” Bolton said.

“I would recommend economic sanctions along the lines of those imposed on Iraq after the invasion of Kuwait in 1990… I believe this is a case that calls for North Korea to be expelled from the United Nations for persistent violations of its charter.”

Bolton also said the US should “return North Korea to the list of state sponsors of terrorism”.

Diplomacy stalled

China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the US have been negotiating since 2003 to persuade the North to abandon its nuclear weapons work in exchange for energy and security guarantees.

Watch Riz Khan

The Riz Khan show looks at the fallout from North Korea’s nuclear tests at 2030GMT.

The six-party talks led to a 2007 agreement under which the North said it would dismantle its nuclear facilities, but the deal stalled during disagreements over verification.

In April, North Korea fired a three-stage rocket that it said launched a satellite into orbit, although the US has said it believes the launch was a cover for a test of the North’s long-range missile technology.

The launch triggered condemnation from the Security Council, in turn provoking an angry reaction from the North, which said it was pulling out of nuclear disarmament talks and restarting its weapons programme.

Explosive yield

The exact size of North Korea’s latest nuclear test has not been confirmed, although state media in its official announcement said it had been on “a higher level in terms of its explosive power” than the detonation in 2006.

Russia’s defence ministry said an atomic explosion had taken place in northeastern North Korea at 9:54am (00:54GMT) and estimated the blast’s yield to be up to 20 kilotonnes, about the same as the US bombs used against the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima at the end of the second world war.

The US Geological Survey (USGS) said it had detected a magnitude 4.7 tremor near the town of Kilchu about 375km northeast of Pyongyang, the capital, and close to where North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in October 2006, which was estimated to be about one kilotonne.

Source: Al Jazeera, News Agencies


More from News
Most Read